Is Ecommerce Agency Still Profitable or Has the Opportunity Peaked?

Some links on The Justifiable are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Read full disclaimer.

If you are asking, “is ecommerce agency still profitable in 2026?” the short answer is yes—but not in the same way it was during the easier growth years. Ecommerce demand is still expanding, yet store builders, AI tools, templates, and cheaper freelancers have made basic execution far less valuable.

The agencies that remain attractive businesses are solving expensive problems: conversion, retention, migration, automation, analytics, creative performance, and operational complexity.

This article will show you where the opportunity still exists, what has become commoditized, and how to build an agency model that can produce healthy margins without depending on hype.

The Ecommerce Agency Opportunity Has Changed, Not Disappeared

The market has not simply peaked or collapsed. What has changed is the type of work merchants will pay meaningful money for and the level of proof they expect before committing to an agency.

Ecommerce Demand Is Still Growing, but Growth Alone Does Not Guarantee Agency Profit

The first mistake is treating ecommerce growth and agency profitability as the same thing. They are related, but they are not interchangeable. U.S. retail ecommerce sales in the second quarter of 2026 were 12.2% higher than a year earlier and represented 17.1% of total retail sales on a seasonally adjusted basis.

However, more ecommerce activity can still coexist with tougher agency economics. A growing brand may spend more on ecommerce overall while spending less on basic design or routine platform administration.

That is why the useful question is not “Is ecommerce still growing?” It is “Which merchant problems remain expensive enough to justify outside expertise?”

Those problems tend to appear when revenue, complexity, or risk rises. A founder launching a simple store can do much more alone than a few years ago. A multi-market brand managing paid acquisition, subscriptions, merchandising, analytics, lifecycle marketing, integrations, and conversion testing still has difficult decisions to make. Agency profit increasingly sits on the difficult side of that divide.

AI Has Commoditized Tasks, Not Business Accountability

AI can now draft product copy, generate design ideas, suggest campaign structures, write code, analyze reports, and automate portions of store management. Platforms such as Shopify are embedding AI directly into merchant workflows, while WooCommerce remains surrounded by an enormous ecosystem of themes, plugins, developers, and automation options.

That change reduces the value of selling labor that a client can reproduce with a prompt, template, or inexpensive contractor. But AI does not remove business accountability. Someone still has to decide what should be changed, prioritize competing opportunities, understand customer economics, diagnose why conversion fell, coordinate implementation, validate tracking, and judge whether a test result is meaningful.

This is the strategic shift: do not position your agency as a collection of hands. Position it as a system for producing a defined commercial outcome. AI should reduce your delivery cost and increase your speed, while your pricing reflects the value of the decision-making and execution system you provide.

The Best Margins Now Sit Where Complexity and Outcomes Meet

The most defensible agency work usually combines three ingredients: the client has a financially important problem, the solution requires coordination or expertise, and the result can be evaluated with meaningful business metrics.

That can include conversion-rate optimization, platform migrations, retention systems, subscription optimization, merchandising strategy, analytics implementation, paid creative systems, international expansion, B2B commerce, or technical integration work.

A hypothetical example makes the difference clear. A small merchant that wants a five-page storefront may compare ten providers and choose on price. A mature brand planning a complicated replatform that affects checkout, inventory, customer data, SEO, analytics, and operations is likely to care more about process, technical competence, migration risk, and launch reliability.

The opportunity has not peaked; the easy-to-copy version of the opportunity has.

If your offer is easy to explain as a commodity task, margin pressure is likely to continue. If it helps a merchant protect or grow meaningful revenue, you have far more room to build a profitable agency.

What Actually Determines Ecommerce Agency Profitability

Revenue can make an agency look successful while hiding weak economics underneath. Profitability depends on how you price, how efficiently you deliver, how long clients stay, and how much selling effort is required to replace churn.

Understand Your Unit Economics Before You Set Revenue Goals

Start with the economics of one client or one project. For each offer, estimate the direct delivery cost: employee or contractor time, software used specifically for the client, outside production, quality assurance, and any other cost that scales with the engagement. Then compare that cost with the fee. The difference is your gross profit before broader overhead such as management, sales, office costs, and general software.

You should also track how much capacity the work consumes. A service can look profitable on paper but become dangerous if it depends on the founder for every strategy call, technical decision, and client escalation. Founder dependency creates an invisible cost because it limits the number of clients the agency can serve.

I recommend building your first profitability model around a few simple questions: How many hours does delivery really take? Which roles are required? How often does work exceed scope? How long does the average client stay? How much does it cost to win another client? Those answers matter more than an impressive top-line revenue target.

Choose the Right Mix of Projects, Retainers, and Performance Incentives

Different revenue models create different risk profiles. One-off projects can generate strong cash flow, but the agency must continually refill the pipeline. Retainers improve predictability, but they become unprofitable when the scope is vague. Performance pricing can create upside, yet it can also expose you to factors you do not control.

Projects can create entry points and larger cash events. Retainers can provide a baseline of recurring revenue. Performance incentives can be added selectively when attribution is credible and the agency has enough influence over the result.

Do not accept large performance risk when inventory, pricing, offer quality, fulfillment, or media budget can change without your approval. You want alignment, not a contract that makes your profit depend on decisions made elsewhere.

Specialization Raises Pricing Power When It Solves a Real Buying Problem

Calling yourself an ecommerce agency for “ambitious brands” is not a meaningful specialization. Building a clear capability around a platform, business model, customer type, or expensive problem can be.

Useful specialization might focus on subscription brands, international expansion, B2B ecommerce, complex migrations, retention, conversion optimization, or a particular vertical where buying behavior and operational constraints are distinctive. Repetition improves delivery. Your team sees the same problems, builds reusable processes, develops better benchmarks, and reaches solutions faster.

That creates a favorable loop: stronger expertise can support better outcomes, better outcomes strengthen proof, stronger proof improves close rates, and better close rates reduce the cost of acquiring revenue.

Avoid making the niche so narrow that the addressable market becomes tiny or cyclical. A good specialization gives you a recognizable wedge without preventing adjacent work. The objective is to become the obvious choice for a valuable problem, not to invent a label that sounds specific but does not improve client economics.

Choose a Market and Offer Before You Chase Clients

A profitable agency is designed from the client backward. Before building a website, hiring contractors, or sending hundreds of cold emails, decide which buyers have enough pain, budget, and urgency to support your service model.

Target Clients With Both a Problem and the Capacity to Pay

They are businesses with serious expectations but insufficient resources, data, or internal capacity to support the work. They may need growth urgently while lacking the traffic, margins, product-market fit, or budget required to produce it.

Define an ideal client profile using operational criteria rather than aspirational language. Consider annual or monthly online revenue, average order value, product margins, traffic volume, marketing spend, platform complexity, team size, geographic reach, and the decision-maker you need access to.

For conversion optimization, for example, a store with very low traffic may not generate enough data for meaningful testing. For lifecycle marketing, a tiny customer database limits the upside. For a replatforming project, a very small merchant may not have enough complexity to justify specialist fees.

It means aligning the offer with the economics. Smaller merchants may be a fit for a standardized audit, template-based implementation, or workshop. Larger brands may justify a custom engagement. Profitability improves when the service intensity matches the client’s ability to capture value.

Pick a Narrow Entry Offer Before Building a Full-Service Menu

Many new agencies start by offering design, development, SEO, paid ads, email, social media, branding, content, analytics, and strategy. Buyers do not know what you are best at, and you must maintain competence across too many disciplines.

A better approach is to choose a narrow entry offer that solves one urgent problem. That offer should be easy to diagnose, easy to explain, and bounded enough to price confidently. Examples might include a conversion audit with implementation, a retention-flow rebuild, a migration readiness assessment, or a product-page optimization sprint.

It is the first logical purchase. Once trust is established, you can expand into adjacent work where you have genuine capability.

This structure also makes sales conversations more useful. Instead of asking, “What marketing help do you need?” you can examine a specific problem and determine whether the client fits. That reduces proposal customisation, shortens the path to a decision, and helps you compare delivery performance across clients. A repeatable first offer is one of the simplest ways to turn an agency from a collection of custom jobs into a business model.

Validate Demand With Conversations Before You Hire a Team

The strongest early validation is that qualified buyers will discuss the problem, accept your diagnosis, and pay for a defined solution.

Before adding fixed cost, speak with potential clients, operators, platform partners, freelancers, and complementary agencies. You are trying to understand how buyers describe the problem, what they have already tried, what triggers a purchase, which alternatives they compare, and what makes them distrust agencies.

A small paid diagnostic can be more informative than a free strategy call because it reveals whether the problem is important enough to fund. Deliver it manually at first. Document the steps, time required, common findings, objections, and follow-on needs.

If ten conversations reveal that prospects like the idea but nobody will pay, do not solve the problem by hiring a salesperson. Rework the offer, market, or positioning. If clients buy but delivery takes twice as long as expected, fix the service economics before increasing volume.

Demand validation is not about proving that ecommerce agencies can make money in general. It is about proving that your specific agency can sell a specific outcome to a specific buyer at a price that leaves room for profit.

Build a Service Model That Clients Still Pay For

Once the market and entry offer are clear, the next job is making the service difficult to replace with software, a generalist freelancer, or an internal junior hire. That requires moving from task delivery to decision support and measurable improvement.

Sell an Outcome System Instead of a List of Deliverables

A stronger offer connects the inputs to the business result they are meant to influence and explains how the agency will decide what to do next.

For example, a conversion program should not be sold as “four tests per month.” A test quota rewards activity, not learning. The service can instead include research, prioritization, instrumentation checks, hypothesis development, implementation, analysis, and a decision process for what happens after each result.

Sending a fixed number of campaigns is not the same as improving repeat-purchase economics. A mature retention service examines segmentation, deliverability, offer timing, customer behavior, contribution margin, and the relationship between campaigns and broader merchandising.

Outcome positioning does not mean guaranteeing revenue. Results depend on factors outside agency control. It means showing the client that every deliverable exists inside a coherent operating system.

When buyers understand the system, they can compare you on methodology, judgment, and fit rather than on how many assets you promise. That is important in a market where production itself is becoming cheaper.

Productize the Repeatable Parts Without Pretending Every Client Is Identical

Productization is useful because it reduces variation. A productized service has a defined problem, scope, process, timeline, required inputs, deliverables, and price logic. Your team knows what “done” means, and the client knows what to expect.

Ecommerce businesses differ in traffic sources, margins, catalog structure, technology, customer behavior, and internal resources. A useful system standardizes the process while leaving room for judgment.

Imagine a retention audit. The intake questionnaire, data request, account review, scoring framework, report structure, and implementation checklist can be standardized. The recommendations should still reflect the client’s customer lifecycle and economics. That gives you efficiency without generic advice.

Junior team members can collect data or perform defined checks while senior people focus on diagnosis and decisions. Over time, templates, quality-control checklists, automation, and AI-assisted analysis can reduce delivery hours further.

I recommend documenting the service after every few engagements. Ask which steps were repeated, which tasks required senior judgment, where clients caused delays, and which inputs were consistently missing. The goal is not to eliminate customization; it is to reserve customization for the parts that actually create value.

Use AI to Improve Margin, but Keep Human Review Where Risk Is High

AI can make an ecommerce agency more profitable when it reduces low-value production time. It can accelerate research summaries, first-draft copy, spreadsheet analysis, code scaffolding, documentation, meeting notes, quality-assurance checklists, creative variations, and internal knowledge retrieval.

The margin benefit appears only if you redesign the workflow. If a task that once took four hours now takes one hour but you keep the same slow review process and add unnecessary outputs, the efficiency gain disappears.

Create clear rules for where AI can draft, where a specialist must review, and where human judgment is mandatory. Customer-facing claims, pricing logic, analytics interpretation, tracking changes, code affecting checkout, legal or compliance language, and major strategic recommendations deserve stronger review than routine internal documentation.

That makes the efficiency advantage temporary unless it is converted into a better service: more analysis, faster iteration, better testing, or higher margin.

“We use AI” is rarely a durable reason to hire an agency. “We identify and implement profitable improvements faster, with a rigorous review process” is much closer to what a serious buyer values.

Acquire Clients Without Buying Unprofitable Revenue

A profitable service still fails if customer acquisition is expensive, unpredictable, or aimed at poor-fit prospects. Your acquisition system should create qualified conversations while protecting the delivery team from desperate discounting and chaotic sales promises.

Build Around Channels Where Trust Can Compound

Build a small body of evidence around your specialization: teardown posts, technical explainers, benchmark frameworks, migration checklists, webinars, or detailed case studies based on real work you are permitted to share.

Partnerships can be even more valuable because the trust is partially transferred. Developers can refer lifecycle work. Paid media specialists can refer conversion work. Accounting or operations firms can surface platform problems. Technology partners can refer implementation needs. The best relationships are reciprocal rather than one-sided requests for leads.

Thousands of providers can compete for attention inside large platform ecosystems. Your profile, proof, reviews, specialization, and response process still matter.

A useful acquisition mix usually has one proactive channel and one compounding channel. Proactive outreach creates conversations now. Content, referrals, partnerships, or community reputation create an asset that improves over time.

Do not evaluate channels by lead count alone. Track qualified opportunities, close rate, average contract value, sales cycle, and retention by source. A channel that sends fewer but better clients can be much more profitable.

Use a Paid Diagnostic or Pilot to Reduce Buyer Risk

Large proposals create friction when the buyer has never worked with you. A smaller paid engagement can reduce risk for both sides while giving you the data required to scope the larger opportunity accurately.

It should not be a disguised sales pitch. Define what you will inspect, what the client will receive, how long it takes, and what decisions the output will support. If you identify follow-on work, explain why it matters and let the client decide whether to continue.

This model works especially well when the main engagement is complex. A migration readiness assessment can uncover integration dependencies before a replatform quote. A tracking audit can identify data quality problems before a growth retainer. A conversion review can establish priorities before development begins.

The pilot also protects margins. Instead of giving away several hours of senior analysis to win a proposal, you charge for diagnosis. You learn how responsive the client is, whether required data exists, how decisions are made, and whether the team is realistic about implementation.

Highly standardized work may be easy to quote directly. But where uncertainty is high, separating diagnosis from implementation is often a better business decision than burying unknowns inside a fixed-price proposal.

Qualify for Economics, Authority, and Operational Readiness

Qualification should protect the agency from engagements that cannot succeed economically or operationally.

Before proposal stage, understand the client’s commercial goal, current performance, budget range, internal owner, decision process, timeline, available data, and constraints. Ask what happens if the problem is not solved. Urgency without consequences may indicate curiosity rather than buying intent.

A client may afford your fee but lack development capacity, creative assets, inventory stability, analytics access, or leadership attention. If your recommendations cannot be implemented, the engagement may produce frustration even when the strategy is sound.

Set disqualifiers in advance. You might decline clients below a certain traffic level for testing, stores with unresolved tracking for performance pricing, or projects where the decision-maker will not participate in key reviews.

This can feel restrictive when the pipeline is small, yet saying yes to unsuitable work is one of the fastest ways to damage profitability. It consumes delivery capacity, increases stress, creates weak case studies, and often leads to churn. Qualification is not merely a sales technique; it is part of your margin system.

Avoid the Mistakes That Destroy Agency Margins

Most agency profitability problems are not caused by the market disappearing. They come from pricing work badly, allowing uncontrolled variation, or retaining clients whose needs no longer match the service.

Stop Underpricing Work Based on Optimistic Delivery Assumptions

The agency may assume clean data, fast approvals, clear requirements, no technical surprises, and minimal revisions. Real projects rarely behave that neatly.

Use historical delivery data whenever possible. Estimate by phase, identify uncertainty, and include project management, communication, review, quality assurance, and revision time. Those hours are real work even if the client never sees them as a deliverable.

For fixed-price projects, create a change process before work starts. Define what is included, what the client must provide, how many revision cycles are allowed where appropriate, and what happens when requirements change. The objective is not to make the contract hostile. It is to prevent ambiguity from becoming unpaid labor.

If you repeatedly exceed scope, do not immediately blame difficult clients. Your offer may be poorly defined. Look for patterns. Perhaps discovery is too shallow, approvals are not staged, or sales is promising outcomes that delivery cannot control.

A higher fee can absorb some variance, but operational problems will eventually consume the additional margin too. Pricing and process must improve together.

Control Custom Work Before It Becomes Your Default Delivery Model

It can create a hidden factory of one-off processes, tools, reports, meetings, and exceptions that your team must remember.

Watch for warning signs: unique reporting formats for every account, custom project-management systems, special meeting cadences, undocumented technical work, one-off pricing logic, and services that exist because one client requested them years ago.

Create a default operating model and make exceptions deliberate. Standardize onboarding, communication channels, reporting cadence, file structure, approval steps, and quality checks. When a client requests something outside the model, decide whether it should become a paid add-on, replace another deliverable, or be declined.

Clients care more about whether the work solves their problem than whether your internal workflow is unique to them.

A useful rule is to customize strategy before operations. The recommendations can reflect the client’s business, while the machinery used to deliver those recommendations remains consistent. That separation protects margin and makes onboarding new team members much easier.

Diagnose Churn Instead of Replacing Every Lost Client With More Sales

It also increases acquisition costs because the sales team must constantly replace departing revenue.

Start by classifying why clients leave. Some churn is healthy: a fixed project ends, a client hires internally, or the original problem is solved. Problematic churn happens when expectations were unclear, results were not visible, communication deteriorated, scope no longer matched needs, or the agency failed to evolve the engagement.

Review churn alongside the client’s first 30 to 90 days. Many retention problems begin during sales and onboarding. If success was never defined, both sides may evaluate the relationship differently. If data access took weeks, the client may feel momentum disappeared before work started.

For retainers, create explicit review points. Show what changed, what was learned, what business metric is being influenced, what remains constrained, and what should happen next. If the service has reached diminishing returns, recommend a smaller scope or a different engagement rather than inventing busywork.

It is one that retains good-fit clients for as long as there is meaningful value to create.

Measure Profitability Before You Try to Scale

Scaling magnifies whatever is already happening. If the agency has weak margins, unclear delivery, and founder bottlenecks, adding more clients and employees usually produces a larger version of the same problems.

Track a Small Set of Metrics That Explain the Business

You do need consistent definitions and a monthly review rhythm.

Start with gross margin by service line, not only company-wide margin. A profitable retainer business can hide an unprofitable development department, or vice versa. Track revenue per client, delivery labor cost, utilization for billable teams, client retention, average contract value, and accounts receivable.

On the sales side, monitor qualified pipeline, close rate, sales cycle, customer acquisition cost where it can be estimated credibly, and revenue by acquisition channel. For recurring work, pay attention to how long it takes for gross profit from a client to recover acquisition cost.

Capacity deserves its own view. If senior strategists are consistently overloaded while junior roles are underused, total utilization can look acceptable while the business is still bottlenecked.

A high utilization rate can look efficient while leaving no room for training, documentation, or business development. A high average contract value can be harmful if larger clients demand disproportionate customization. Metrics should help you ask better questions, not reward numbers that can be gamed.

Improve Margin by Fixing the Delivery System Before Cutting Quality

Sometimes cost reduction is necessary, but indiscriminate cutting can damage the very expertise clients pay for.

Map the delivery process from sale to renewal. Look for waiting time, rework, duplicated analysis, unclear approvals, manual reporting, repeated data collection, and senior people performing tasks that could be standardized or delegated.

Then remove waste in order. Improve intake so the team starts with the correct information. Build reusable checklists and templates. Automate data pulls or routine documentation where reliable. Clarify decision rights so work does not bounce between reviewers. Use AI for first-pass analysis or production where human verification is straightforward.

Protect the moments that create judgment. Senior review of strategy, client-specific interpretation, difficult technical decisions, and prioritization may be expensive but valuable. The goal is to reduce cost around those moments, not eliminate them.

If delivery hours fall while client outcomes, satisfaction, and retention remain stable or improve, you have created real operating leverage. If complaints and rework rise, the “efficiency” may simply have moved cost to another part of the process.

Hire Against a Bottleneck, Not Against a Revenue Milestone

Identify the bottleneck. If the founder handles every sales call but delivery is smooth, the next hire may support sales or account strategy. If sales is strong but projects queue for technical implementation, you may need delivery capacity. If senior people spend hours preparing reports, the solution may be process redesign rather than another senior hire.

Before employing someone full time, make sure the role has enough recurring work to justify fixed cost. Contractors can provide useful flexibility for specialized or variable demand, although overreliance on contractors can create knowledge and availability problems of its own.

Document the role in terms of outputs, decisions, and handoffs. A vague “ecommerce specialist” position often becomes a bucket for whatever the founder does not want to handle.

Hiring ahead of clarity can increase management burden without creating capacity, leaving the founder with more people to coordinate and the same underlying bottleneck. A clear constraint gives every new role a measurable reason to exist.

Scale Around Expertise, Systems, and Recurring Value

Once the core model is profitable, growth should increase leverage rather than simply add more custom work. The strongest scale paths deepen expertise, improve recurring value, and expand into problems that naturally follow the agency’s existing work.

Expand From a Wedge Into Adjacent High-Value Problems

It means choosing an entry point and expanding logically once you have proof, trust, and delivery capability.

Suppose your agency starts with conversion optimization. Over time, you may discover that the largest constraints are landing-page production, merchandising, site performance, analytics, or lifecycle coordination. Those can become adjacent offers if they improve the same client outcome.

The key is adjacency. Adding a completely unrelated service because one client asked for it can dilute expertise and create operational complexity. Adding a capability that repeatedly blocks results can strengthen the core proposition.

Use client data to decide. Track common follow-on requests, bottlenecks found during audits, reasons clients hire another provider, and services that correlate with longer retention. Then test the new capability with a few existing clients before marketing it broadly.

Breadth becomes the result of accumulated competence rather than a sales claim. You can eventually serve more of the client’s ecommerce system while keeping a clear point of view about what your agency is actually excellent at.

Build Recurring Revenue Around Ongoing Decisions, Not Permanent Busywork

But a retainer is only durable when the underlying problem genuinely recurs.

Good recurring work involves continual decisions: testing, merchandising, lifecycle optimization, creative iteration, analytics review, technical maintenance, or strategic planning. The environment changes, new data arrives, and there is a reason to keep improving.

Weak retainers are bundles of deliverables that exist mainly to justify the monthly invoice. Clients eventually notice when reports, meetings, or content are produced without a meaningful decision attached.

Design recurring services around a cadence of observation, action, and learning. For example, review performance, identify the highest-priority constraint, implement the change, measure the result, and decide the next step. This creates an operating loop rather than a task subscription.

That also gives the agency a better renewal conversation and a clearer reason to continue. Instead of defending how many hours were spent, you can discuss what changed, what was learned, and where the next commercial opportunity exists.

Prepare for Agentic Commerce and More Automated Merchant Operations

The next agency opportunity is likely to involve less manual administration and more orchestration across automated systems. In 2026, ecommerce platforms are already moving toward AI-assisted store management, AI shopping interfaces, automated campaign decisions, and commerce experiences that can begin outside a traditional storefront.

That creates new work even as old tasks disappear. Merchants may need help structuring product data for AI discovery, governing automated workflows, validating analytics, integrating systems, designing experiments, managing feed quality, protecting brand standards, and deciding which automated recommendations deserve action.

When software made publishing easier, businesses did not stop needing strategy. They changed what they paid specialists to do.

Build competence around the operational consequences of automation. Learn how your clients’ platforms expose data, how attribution changes across new shopping surfaces, where human approval is required, and which workflows can be automated safely.

The agencies that benefit most will not compete with automation on repetitive execution. They will help merchants configure, supervise, and improve the increasingly automated commerce system.

The Opportunity Has Not Peaked, but the Bar Is Higher

So, is ecommerce agency still profitable? Yes, it can be—but the attractive version of the business is no longer built around doing routine ecommerce tasks that clients can increasingly handle with templates, AI, or low-cost labor. The opportunity has moved toward expertise that improves revenue, reduces risk, coordinates complexity, and creates an ongoing decision advantage.

If you are considering starting now, do not begin by trying to look like a large full-service agency. Choose one valuable problem, one reachable client profile, and one bounded paid offer. Validate that clients will buy it and that you can deliver it with healthy economics. Then standardize what repeats, protect the judgment that creates value, and expand only into adjacent problems you can solve well.

Juxhin

I’m Juxhin, the voice behind The Justifiable.
I’ve spent 6+ years building blogs, managing affiliate campaigns, and testing the messy world of online business. Here, I cut the fluff and share the strategies that actually move the needle — so you can build income that’s sustainable, not speculative.

Related posts:

How Much Money Do You Need to Start an Ecommerce Agency, Really? Ecommerce Agency Mistakes to Avoid Before They Cost You Clients and Cash How Much Can an Ecommerce Agency Make? Real Numbers and Revenue Examples How To Start An Ecommerce Agency From Scratch in 10 Actionable Steps Ecommerce Agency Income Potential: What’s Realistic and What’s Hype? Ecommerce Agency for Shopify Stores: Services That Clients Actually Buy