How To Do Competitor Analysis Using Serpstat That Reveals Hidden Gaps

Some links on The Justifiable are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Read full disclaimer.

Learning how to do competitor analysis using Serpstat is less about copying what other websites already rank for and more about finding opportunities they expose unintentionally.

A competitor may reveal underserved keywords, weak pages, missing topics, link opportunities, or SERP patterns you can use to make better SEO decisions. The challenge is separating useful gaps from noisy data.

In this guide, I’ll show you how to identify the right search competitors, compare keyword coverage, inspect winning pages, evaluate backlink differences, prioritize realistic opportunities, and build a repeatable process you can measure over time.

Understand What Competitor Analysis In Serpstat Actually Reveals

Competitor research becomes useful when you treat it as a decision system rather than a data collection exercise. The goal is to discover where competitors have proven demand, where your site is underrepresented, and which gaps are realistic enough to pursue.

Separate Business Competitors From Search Competitors

Your commercial competitors and your organic search competitors are not always the same websites. A local accounting firm may compete for clients with three nearby firms, yet its search results could also be dominated by national publishers, software companies, government resources, and large directories.

That distinction matters because SEO competition is based on who appears for the queries you want to win. Serpstat’s Site Analysis competitor reporting is designed around keyword overlap, which helps surface domains that repeatedly compete with your site in organic results rather than relying only on brands you already know.

Start with your domain, then look for competitors that repeatedly overlap with you across commercially important topics. Do not automatically treat every large publisher as a primary rival. A high-authority informational site may dominate broad questions but have little relevance to the pages that generate revenue for your business.

I recommend creating three groups: direct commercial competitors, search competitors with strong keyword overlap, and topic-specific competitors that dominate only one category. This prevents a common mistake: comparing your whole site with an enormous domain whose business model, authority, and content footprint are completely different.

Read Competitive Metrics As Signals, Not Scores To Beat

Competitor dashboards can quickly turn into a contest over traffic estimates, visibility scores, keyword counts, and authority metrics. Those numbers are useful, but only when they help you answer a specific question.

For example, a rival with far more ranking keywords may simply publish across a broader topic range. That does not mean you need to match its total keyword count. A competitor with stronger estimated traffic may have one or two dominant pages carrying much of that visibility. A site with more referring domains may still have weak coverage around the exact product category you care about.

Use metrics comparatively. Ask whether a competitor is stronger because it covers more topics, ranks higher for shared terms, owns more high-intent pages, or has stronger authority supporting similar content. Serpstat’s Site Analysis Overview provides a summary of organic keywords, estimated traffic, visibility, authority, and competitors, making it useful for this first-pass benchmark before you move into individual reports.

I recommend using competitive metrics to locate the reason a rival is winning. Once you find the reason, you can decide whether it is relevant, achievable, and worth acting on.

Prepare The Right Competitive Analysis Before You Open Reports

A clean setup makes every later filter more useful. Before comparing domains, decide which market, search scope, competitors, and business outcomes matter so the results do not become a giant spreadsheet of unrelated keywords.

Define The Search Market You Actually Want To Win

Competitor analysis can change significantly depending on region, language, device assumptions, and whether you are analyzing a full domain, subdomain, subfolder, or exact URL. If the scope is wrong, the gaps will be wrong too.

Start by writing down the market you are targeting. For a US SaaS company, that might be English-language Google searches in the United States. For a retailer operating separately in the UK and Australia, you would usually analyze those markets independently because demand, competitors, SERP composition, and wording can differ.

Next, choose the correct site scope. Whole-domain analysis works well when you are mapping overall competitors. Subfolder analysis is more useful when a large site has clearly separated product lines or content hubs. Exact-URL analysis becomes valuable later when you want to understand why one competing page performs better than yours.

Serpstat lets Site Analysis work with domains, subfolders, or URLs and requires you to select the relevant regional database.

Build A Competitor Set With Different Strategic Roles

A useful competitor set should not contain five versions of the same company. You learn more by comparing sites that win in different ways.

Choose one or two direct commercial rivals that sell something similar. Add one search-first competitor with excellent organic coverage, even if its business model differs slightly. Then include a niche specialist that performs especially well in one category you want to grow. If your SERPs are dominated by marketplaces, review sites, or publishers, add one of those only when its presence teaches you something about search intent.

This mix helps reveal different gaps. Direct rivals show commercial pages you may be missing. Content-heavy competitors expose educational topics and long-tail demand. Niche leaders often reveal depth, terminology, and supporting subtopics. Aggregators can show when Google appears to prefer comparison experiences over single-brand landing pages.

Keep a short reason beside every domain you add. For example: “direct product competitor,” “owns beginner education,” or “dominates comparison keywords.” That note becomes valuable later when a keyword gap appears. You will know whether the competitor is relevant because it serves the same buyer or merely because its broad domain ranks for many unrelated terms.

Establish A Baseline Before Hunting For Gaps

A gap matters only relative to your current performance. Before analyzing rivals, capture a baseline for the parts of your own site you want to improve.

At minimum, note your important ranking pages, primary topic clusters, priority commercial keywords, and pages already receiving organic traffic. If you use Google Search Console, you can also review queries where impressions are rising but positions or clicks remain weak. That helps distinguish between completely missing opportunities and topics where you already have some visibility.

Then define what you want competitor analysis to produce. For a newer site, the goal may be identifying achievable content topics. For an established site, the higher-value goal may be finding weak keyword coverage on pages that already rank. For an ecommerce site, the priority could be missing category or comparison pages rather than more informational articles.

I suggest setting three output buckets before you begin: create, improve, and monitor. Every useful finding should eventually land in one of them.

Find Your Real Organic Competitors In Serpstat

Once your scope is clear, use Serpstat to replace assumptions with search data. Start broad enough to discover unexpected rivals, then narrow the list based on relevance, overlap, and the specific search segments you care about.

Start With Site Analysis And The Competitors Report

Enter your domain in Site Analysis and begin with the Overview to understand the size of your current search footprint. Then open the Competitors report to see domains that overlap with your organic keyword set. Serpstat currently bases this competitive view on shared search terms, which can reveal websites you would never place on a traditional sales competitor list.

Review common keywords, total keyword coverage, visibility, traffic estimates, and authority together. A competitor with moderate authority but unusually high overlap may deserve more attention than a huge publisher with far more total traffic but little relationship to your core topics.

Look for repeated patterns. If several competitors rank across the same cluster that you barely cover, that is an early sign of a structural content gap. If one rival has similar keyword coverage but consistently stronger visibility, the issue may be quality, authority, internal linking, or better alignment with search intent rather than missing topics.

Create a shortlist rather than analyzing everyone. For most projects, a small set of highly relevant competitors produces clearer insights than dozens of domains.

Qualify Competitors Before Comparing Their Keywords

A keyword-overlap report tells you who competes in search, but you still need to judge whether each domain is strategically comparable.

Open the strongest candidates and look at what they actually publish and sell. Ask whether they target the same audience, whether their relevant pages support similar search intent, and whether the portion of their site overlapping with yours is central to their business. This stops a large but tangential site from distorting your analysis.

Then compare competitive scale. If your site ranks for a few hundred relevant terms and a rival ranks for hundreds of thousands across unrelated categories, avoid making domain-wide comparisons your primary source of insight. Instead, analyze its relevant subfolder or exact pages.

Also check whether competitors are winning because of one content type. One domain may dominate definitions and tutorials, while another performs best with category pages or comparison content. That difference gives you a clue about the format Google rewards at each stage of the funnel.

I recommend marking each competitor as high, medium, or low relevance. Use high-relevance domains in your main Keyword Gap analysis. Use medium-relevance domains for topic-specific investigations. Ignore low-relevance domains unless they repeatedly appear for a strategic query.

Narrow Competition At The Topic And URL Level

Whole-domain competitors are useful for mapping the market, but hidden gaps often appear only when you zoom into a topic or specific page.

Suppose your website sells project management software. A broad competitor comparison may show large SaaS companies, review platforms, and productivity publishers. But for “construction project management software,” the real competitive set can be much smaller and more specialized. That is the level where content decisions become easier.

Use keyword-level SERP research to identify domains and pages repeatedly appearing for a target query. Serpstat’s keyword competitor and Top by Keyword reports can help distinguish domain-level competitors from the individual pages Google is ranking for a specific search.

Then examine the exact URLs. Note content type, angle, depth, audience, and whether the page is informational or commercial. If three top pages are comparison guides and your page is a thin feature page, the “gap” may be format and intent rather than missing keywords.

This narrower analysis is especially useful before creating a new page. It shows whether you are entering a SERP where your existing content type has a realistic fit. By the time you move into Keyword Gap, you should know both your broad competitors and your topic-specific ones.

Use Keyword Gap To Reveal Missing And Weak Opportunities

Keyword Gap is where competitor research becomes an actionable content plan. The report is most useful when you separate truly missing topics from weak rankings and then filter opportunities by intent, relevance, and realistic difficulty.

Run The Keyword Gap Report With A Focused Domain Set

In Serpstat, open Site Analysis and go to Keyword Gap. Add your domain first, then add the most relevant competitors you qualified earlier. The current report supports comparison of your target with up to four competitors and separates opportunities into views such as Missing, Weak, and Strong.

That distinction matters. A missing keyword may require a new page, but a weak keyword may be better addressed by updating an existing page. Strong keywords tell you where you already outperform the comparison set and should avoid unnecessary rewrites.

Use the same regional database for every domain. Then start with Missing, not because every missing keyword is valuable, but because it provides the clearest view of topics competitors cover and you do not.

A simple action framework helps:

Filter Gaps By Intent, Relevance, And Winnability

The fastest way to waste a competitor analysis is to sort by search volume and chase the largest numbers. Hidden gaps are valuable because they fit your business and can realistically move a reader toward an outcome.

First, remove keywords that are irrelevant to your products, services, audience, or geography. Next, group the remaining terms by intent: informational, commercial investigation, transactional, and navigational. This reveals whether the competitor advantage sits near the top of the funnel or closer to a buying decision.

Then look at position, volume, and keyword difficulty together rather than in isolation. A lower-volume term with clear commercial intent and moderate competition can be more valuable than a broad, high-volume query dominated by publishers and established brands. Serpstat allows Keyword Gap filtering by metrics such as volume, difficulty, and competitor position.

Pay special attention to patterns where multiple relevant competitors rank and you do not. One competitor can rank accidentally. Three or four competitors covering the same theme is stronger evidence that the topic belongs in your market.

The best gap is not simply “a keyword we lack.” It is “a relevant search need we are not serving well.”

Convert Keyword Gaps Into Content Decisions

Raw keyword lists do not belong on an editorial calendar. They need to be translated into topics, pages, and updates.

Group related queries by the problem the searcher is trying to solve. For example, “CRM for photographers,” “best CRM for photography business,” and “photographer client management software” may belong to one strong commercial comparison page rather than three separate articles. The goal is to create a page that can satisfy the cluster without forcing every keyword into the copy.

Next, assign each cluster to create, improve, or merge. Create when no current page satisfies the intent. Improve when a relevant page exists but has weak coverage or poor rankings. Merge when multiple thin pages compete around the same topic and would be stronger together.

Look at the competitors already ranking for the cluster. What questions do they answer? What format do they use? Where are they incomplete, outdated, vague, or overly generic? Your advantage should come from satisfying the user better, not from reproducing the same outline with more words.

A competitor keyword gap is evidence of demand, not an instruction to copy. The opportunity becomes valuable only after you decide what better answer, experience, or offer your page can provide.

Reverse-Engineer Competitor Pages To Find Deeper Content Gaps

Domain-level gaps show what topics are missing. Page-level analysis reveals why individual competitors rank and where their content leaves room for a better page, clearer intent match, or stronger supporting cluster.

Use Top Pages To Find Proven Competitor Themes

Open Site Analysis for a qualified competitor and review Top Pages. The current report ranks pages by estimated organic traffic and lets you expand individual URLs to inspect the keywords they rank for.

Do not simply copy the competitor’s five highest-traffic article topics. Instead, look for patterns across the pages. Are calculators driving attention? Are commercial comparison pages outperforming generic guides? Does one product category receive unusually deep coverage? Are templates, examples, glossaries, or use-case pages repeatedly visible?

Then compare those patterns with your own site. A hidden gap often appears as a missing content format rather than one missing keyword. For example, you may have strong educational articles but no solution pages for industry-specific use cases. Or you may have product pages but no supporting comparison content that helps buyers evaluate alternatives.

Inspect the keywords beneath relevant top pages to understand their topical breadth. If a single page ranks for many related queries, it may be serving a broader intent cluster than its title suggests. That tells you to build a comprehensive page rather than several narrow ones.

Use Page-Level Missing Keywords To Improve Existing URLs

Some of the easiest competitor gaps are not new content opportunities. They are missing subtopics on pages that already rank.

Choose an important URL on your site and compare it with relevant competing pages. Serpstat’s Missing Keywords functionality is designed to surface queries for which competing pages rank strongly while the analyzed page does not, giving you a focused way to expand page semantics without rebuilding your entire strategy.

Review each missing query manually. Ask whether it represents the same search intent as your page. If it does, identify what would need to change for the page to deserve visibility. Sometimes the fix is a missing section. Sometimes the page needs a clearer definition, pricing explanation, comparison table, use case, example, FAQ-style answer inside the main content, or stronger internal links.

Avoid inserting every missing phrase verbatim. That produces awkward copy and can weaken topical focus. Instead, use the keywords to infer concepts the competitor page covers more completely.

Imagine your page ranks for “email automation software” but misses queries around “behavior-based email triggers.” If the feature is relevant to your product and user intent, add a useful explanation showing how triggers work, when to use them, and what mistakes to avoid. You are closing an information gap, not filling a keyword quota.

Compare Content Type Before You Rewrite Anything

A page can be well written and still lose because it is the wrong type of result for the query.

Before improving a weak page, search the target keyword through Serpstat’s keyword research reports and inspect the top-ranking pages. Determine whether Google is favoring tutorials, category pages, product comparisons, templates, list posts, product pages, or a mixed SERP. Top Pages in Keyword Research can show which pages rank for a query and the broader keyword sets associated with them.

Then compare your page’s job with the job those pages perform. If buyers search “best payroll software for restaurants” and the leading results compare multiple options, a single-brand product page may struggle because it does not satisfy the evaluation intent. In that case, the solution may be creating a genuine comparison resource rather than stuffing more phrases into the product page.

Also examine SERP breadth. If competitors rank with pages that answer setup, pricing, use cases, alternatives, and limitations in one resource, the expected depth may be higher than your current content provides.

Analyze Backlink Gaps Without Chasing Every Competitor Link

Keyword and content gaps explain what competitors rank for. Backlink analysis helps you understand whether authority and external references are supporting those rankings, and which link opportunities might be realistically reproducible.

Compare Referring Domains Around Relevant Competitors

Start with the competitors that repeatedly beat you on important topics, not every domain from the initial report. Open Backlink Analysis and compare their referring-domain patterns with your own.

You are looking for meaningful differences: industry publications, resource pages, associations, software directories, partners, universities, local organizations, or specialist blogs that link to competitors but not to you. Serpstat’s referring-domain reporting lets you inspect the unique domains linking to a target site, making it possible to study competitor donor bases rather than only total backlink counts.

A link gap becomes more interesting when the same reputable domain links to multiple competitors. That pattern can suggest the publisher regularly references solutions in your category. It still does not guarantee you can earn a link, but it gives you a better outreach hypothesis than contacting random websites.

Separate links earned by the competitor’s brand size from links earned by a specific asset. News coverage of a funding round may not be replicable. A regularly updated benchmark, calculator, template, original dataset, or detailed guide may be.

Judge Link Quality Before Calling It A Gap

Not every competitor backlink is worth pursuing. A large referring-domain count can include low-quality directories, irrelevant sites, syndicated pages, old partnerships, or links that provide little strategic value.

Evaluate relevance first. Does the linking site serve an audience connected to your topic or industry? Next, inspect context. Is the competitor cited as a useful resource, listed among vendors, mentioned in an article, or linked through a partnership? Then consider whether your site has an equivalent or better destination page.

This last question is often ignored. Outreach fails when marketers ask for a backlink before they have anything worth linking to. If a competitor earns links to a free calculator and you only have a sales page, the real gap is the asset, not the outreach list.

Also compare link distribution. If competitor educational resources attract links while their product pages do not, that suggests a two-step strategy: build link-worthy informational assets and use internal links to pass relevance toward commercial pages.

Avoid copying suspicious link patterns. Competitor analysis shows what exists, not what search engines will reward.

Turn Repeated Link Patterns Into Assets And Outreach Angles

The most valuable backlink gaps often repeat. If several competitors earn links from the same type of page, you may have discovered a format the market naturally references.

For example, suppose competitors are repeatedly cited in “best tools for agencies” resources. Your first action should be checking whether your positioning, proof, pricing information, and landing page make inclusion easy. If competitors attract links through templates, statistics pages, or research summaries, ask whether you can produce an original resource with a genuinely useful angle.

Build an outreach list only after you understand why each prospect might care. A useful spreadsheet can include prospect domain, linking page, competitor referenced, link context, target asset, relationship status, and next action.

Do not send the same pitch to every domain. A resource-page editor needs a different reason to link than a partner, journalist, association, or blogger. Competitive research gives you context that should make the outreach more specific.

The hidden advantage is not the competitor URL itself. It is the pattern behind the link. Once you understand the pattern, you can create something that deserves inclusion and approach publishers with a credible reason to update their page.

Avoid Competitor Analysis Mistakes That Produce Bad SEO Decisions

Competitor tools make it easy to collect data faster than you can interpret it. Most failures come from choosing the wrong comparison set, misreading estimates, or treating every gap as an instruction to create more content.

Fix Wrong Competitors, Databases, And Site Scope First

If your Keyword Gap report looks full of irrelevant phrases, do not start filtering harder. Check the setup.

The wrong regional database can introduce competitors and search behavior that do not reflect your market. Comparing a subfolder against full competitor domains can exaggerate coverage differences. Including a general publisher in a commercial competitor set can flood the report with informational topics you would never target.

Return to the competitor qualification process. Remove domains that do not share your audience, product category, or topic focus closely enough. If a competitor is relevant only in one area, compare its specific subfolder or pages instead of the entire domain.

Also check whether you entered the preferred domain variation and scope consistently. A technical mismatch can make two otherwise reasonable comparisons misleading.

If results still feel noisy, narrow the problem. Start with one strategic topic, identify who ranks there, and build the competitor set outward from that SERP. This bottom-up method is often more accurate for businesses with several unrelated product lines.

Stop Treating Every Missing Keyword As A New Page

Keyword gap tools can encourage content inflation. You see 5,000 missing queries and suddenly the editorial calendar contains 200 articles.

That is usually the wrong response.

Many keywords are close variants of the same intent. Others belong naturally as subsections of an existing page. Some are irrelevant, too broad, too competitive, or disconnected from the customer journey. Creating a separate page for each variation can fragment authority and create cannibalization.

Cluster before creating. Ask whether the same searcher would be satisfied by one strong page. If yes, build around the intent cluster. Then check your existing content. A page already ranking on page two may be a better candidate for expansion than a brand-new article starting from zero.

Watch for internal competition after publishing. If two pages begin ranking for the same group of queries and alternate positions, review whether they serve distinct intents. If they do not, consolidation may produce a stronger result.

Competitor data should make your content architecture clearer, not larger by default.

Treat Traffic, Visibility, And Difficulty As Estimates

SEO platforms provide modeled metrics. They are valuable for comparison and prioritization, but they are not your analytics account and should not be interpreted as exact business results.

Use estimated traffic to spot unusually strong competitor pages, not to claim that a competitor receives a precise number of visitors. Use keyword difficulty to compare relative ranking pressure, not as a guarantee that a score below a chosen threshold will be easy. Use visibility to understand trend and relative presence, not as a revenue metric.

Cross-check your own performance with first-party data where possible. If Serpstat estimates that a page is gaining visibility, compare that direction with impressions, clicks, conversions, or leads in your own analytics stack. The numbers may differ because the data sources and models are different, but the trend can still be useful.

The same caution applies to competitors. You cannot see their real conversion rate, customer acquisition cost, content production cost, or revenue from organic search. A keyword that appears valuable externally may generate little business value for them.

Measure Competitor Gaps And Scale What Actually Works

A competitor analysis becomes a growth system only when you track what happened after acting on it. Connect your gap backlog with ranking changes, page performance, and recurring reviews so the process improves instead of restarting from zero every quarter.

Track Priority Keywords Against The Same Competitors

Once you select a group of gap keywords, add the most important ones to a rank-tracking project. Keep the competitor set consistent enough to see whether your relative position changes after content updates, new pages, internal linking, or link acquisition.

Serpstat’s Rank Tracker competitor reporting can compare domains across a tracked keyword set and show metrics such as traffic share, keyword quantity, and average position over time. It also supports keyword tags, which are useful for separating commercial, informational, product, location, or campaign-specific segments.

Tagging matters because sitewide averages can hide progress. Your overall average position may barely move while one high-value product cluster improves dramatically. Track the segment that matches the work you completed.

Create a review cadence based on how quickly your market moves. A fast-changing SaaS category may need more frequent checks than a stable local service niche. Avoid reacting to every daily fluctuation. Look for sustained movement across several related queries and pages.

When a competitor suddenly gains across a cluster, inspect what changed. They may have updated a page, launched supporting content, gained links, or shifted internal linking. The goal is not constant imitation. It is maintaining enough competitive context to explain meaningful ranking changes.

Build A Gap Scorecard That Prioritizes Business Value

To keep analysis from becoming subjective, create a lightweight scorecard for every opportunity.

I recommend evaluating five dimensions: business relevance, search intent value, competitor validation, ranking feasibility, and implementation effort. Score each from one to five, then add a simple note explaining the decision. You do not need a sophisticated formula. Consistency matters more than mathematical precision.

A keyword cluster with moderate volume might receive a high score because it connects directly to a profitable product, several qualified competitors rank for it, and you already have a page that could be improved quickly. A massive informational topic might score lower because it sits far from conversion and requires significant authority to compete.

Track outcome metrics based on the action. For new pages, watch indexing, impressions, ranking coverage, organic clicks, assisted conversions, and leads where applicable. For content updates, compare ranking distribution and query coverage before and after. For backlink initiatives, track acquired referring domains and the performance of the linked pages.

Document what did not work too. A failed gap can teach you that the intent was misunderstood, the SERP was too strong, or the topic lacked business value.

Scale Research With Exports And Repeatable Workflows

Manual analysis is appropriate when you are learning a market. Once the process works, scale the repeatable parts while keeping human judgment around relevance and intent.

Create a standard workflow: update competitor list, run Keyword Gap, filter missing and weak terms, review top competitor pages, check link patterns, score opportunities, assign actions, then move priority keywords into tracking. Save the same naming conventions and tags so quarterly comparisons remain clean.

For larger projects, Serpstat supports bulk analysis and integrations that can reduce copy-paste work. Its Google Sheets integration can pull competitor, keyword, and URL data into spreadsheet workflows, while domain batch analysis supports comparing multiple domains across SEO and backlink metrics.

Automation should handle extraction and organization, not strategic approval. A script can identify keywords where several competitors rank and you do not. It cannot fully judge whether those keywords match your offer, whether one page should target the cluster, or whether the SERP reflects an intent you can satisfy.

Turn Serpstat Competitor Gaps Into Your Next SEO Priorities

The best competitor analysis ends with fewer, clearer decisions. Use Serpstat to identify who truly competes with you in search, separate missing keywords from weak rankings, inspect the pages and link patterns behind competitor visibility, and then prioritize only the gaps that fit your audience and business model.

Start with one strategic topic rather than your entire website. Choose three or four qualified competitors, run Keyword Gap, and place the strongest opportunities into create, improve, or merge buckets. Then validate the winning ideas at the page and SERP level before investing in production.

As results arrive, track the same keyword segments and competitors so you can see which types of gaps produce real progress. Over time, this turns competitor analysis from a one-off research task into a repeatable system for finding demand, improving content, and allocating SEO resources more intelligently.

Juxhin

I’m Juxhin, the voice behind The Justifiable.
I’ve spent 6+ years building blogs, managing affiliate campaigns, and testing the messy world of online business. Here, I cut the fluff and share the strategies that actually move the needle — so you can build income that’s sustainable, not speculative.

Related posts:

How To Find Competitor Keywords Using SimilarWeb Fast How To Use Serpstat For Keyword Research That Wins How To Build A Serpstat SEO Growth Strategy That Compounds SpyFu Competitors Ranked: 5 Best Alternatives Squirrly Content Optimization Strategy For Higher Rankings Serpstat Keyword Research Tool Review: Deep Dive