How Much Traffic Do I Need to Make Ecommerce Profit? Use This Formula

Some links on The Justifiable are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Read full disclaimer.

If you are asking how much traffic do I need to make ecommerce profit, the useful answer is not a universal visitor number. It depends on your conversion rate, contribution margin per order, fixed costs, and monthly profit target.

A store with strong margins and a 3% conversion rate can reach profitability with far less traffic than a low-margin store converting at 1%.

The formula in this guide lets you work backward from the profit you want, calculate the orders you need, and estimate the traffic required without relying on vague ecommerce benchmarks.

Start With Profit, Not Traffic

Traffic is only an input. Profit appears when enough visitors become orders and each order leaves enough money after variable costs to cover your fixed expenses and desired earnings.

Revenue Can Grow While Profit Stays Flat

A common ecommerce mistake is treating revenue as proof that a store is becoming healthier. Revenue tells you how much customers spent. It does not tell you how much you kept after product costs, shipping support, transaction fees, returns, fulfillment, commissions, and other variable expenses.

Imagine two stores each generate $50,000 in monthly revenue. Store A keeps $22 from each order after variable costs. Store B keeps $48. Even with similar traffic and conversion rates, their paths to profit look completely different because the amount available to cover fixed expenses differs so much.

That is why the traffic question needs to start with contribution margin rather than revenue alone. Contribution margin is the money left from an order after costs that rise when you sell another order. That remaining amount contributes toward rent, salaries, software subscriptions, accounting, owner compensation, and profit.

If you optimize traffic before understanding contribution margin, you can accidentally scale an offer that loses money. More visitors may produce more orders, yet every extra order can deepen the loss. The goal is not maximum traffic. The goal is enough economically valuable traffic to create the contribution required for your target profit.

Break-Even Traffic And Profit-Target Traffic Are Different

Break-even means your store generates enough contribution to cover fixed operating costs, leaving roughly zero operating profit under the assumptions in your model. Profit-target traffic goes further. It includes the earnings you want on top of those fixed costs.

The distinction matters because a store can technically break even while still failing to pay the owner enough, fund inventory growth, absorb seasonality, or create a cash reserve. If your real objective is $5,000 in monthly operating profit, calculating only break-even traffic gives you a target that is too low.

Use these two concepts separately:

• Break-even requirement: Fixed costs ÷ contribution generated per visitor.
• Profit-target requirement: Fixed costs plus target profit ÷ contribution generated per visitor.

For planning, I recommend using a specific monthly profit target rather than saying you simply want the store to be “profitable.” A clear dollar target forces you to account for the economics that traffic needs to support. It also gives you a number you can compare against actual results each month.

Use The Core Ecommerce Profit Traffic Formula

Once you know what traffic metric you are using, the calculation becomes straightforward. You need four numbers: target profit, fixed costs, contribution margin per order, and conversion rate.

Calculate Required Orders From Your Profit Goal

Start with the total contribution your store must produce during the month:

Required contribution = target monthly profit + monthly fixed costs

Then calculate the number of orders needed:

Required orders = required contribution ÷ contribution margin per order

Suppose your monthly fixed costs are $4,000, you want $6,000 in operating profit, and each order contributes $35 after variable costs. You need $10,000 of total contribution.

$10,000 ÷ $35 = 285.7 orders

Because you cannot fulfill 0.7 of an order, round up to 286 orders. At 286 orders, the model produces about $10,010 in contribution, enough to cover the $4,000 fixed-cost assumption and leave about $6,010 in operating profit.

This approach is more useful than starting with a random traffic target because every variable has economic meaning. If your contribution margin rises, required orders fall. If fixed expenses rise, required orders increase. If your profit goal changes, you can update it instantly.

Keep taxes, financing costs, owner distributions, and unusual one-time expenses separate unless you specifically want the model to include them. The cleaner your definitions, the easier it becomes to compare forecasts with actual store performance.

Convert Required Orders Into Required Traffic

Once you know the order target, apply your conversion rate:

Required traffic = required orders ÷ conversion rate

Conversion rate must be written as a decimal in the calculation. A 2.5% conversion rate becomes 0.025. Keep the denominator consistent: a session-based conversion rate produces a session target, while a user-based rate produces a user target.

Using the earlier example:

286 orders ÷ 0.025 = 11,440 visits

Under those assumptions, the store needs roughly 11,440 visits during the month to generate 286 orders and reach about $6,000 in operating profit.

You can combine the equations into one formula:

Required traffic = (target profit + fixed costs) ÷ (conversion rate × contribution margin per order)

This is the central formula to keep. It tells you why there is no credible universal answer to “how much ecommerce traffic is enough?” Two stores can need radically different visitor volumes because their conversion economics differ.

Treat the result as a planning estimate, not a promise. Conversion rate and contribution margin fluctuate. Seasonality, product mix, returns, discounting, channel quality, inventory availability, and customer behavior can all move the result. A practical forecast should therefore use a conservative base case plus stronger and weaker scenarios.

Run A Simple Sensitivity Check

A single traffic number can create false confidence. A better model shows how much traffic you need under several realistic conversion rates.

Using the same example of 286 required orders:

The implication is important: improving conversion from 1.5% to 2.5% reduces the traffic requirement substantially without changing the profit target or order economics.

Do not automatically assume you can raise conversion to the highest scenario. Use ranges grounded in your own store data. If you currently convert around 1.7%, a 3.5% forecast may be unrealistic without meaningful changes to traffic intent, merchandising, offer quality, site experience, or customer mix.

A sensitivity table turns the formula into a decision tool. It shows whether your easier path is acquiring more visitors, improving conversion, increasing contribution margin, lowering fixed costs, or combining several smaller improvements.

Calculate Contribution Margin Per Order Correctly

The formula is only as reliable as the contribution margin you feed into it. Underestimating variable costs can make a store look profitable on paper while cash tells a different story.

Separate Gross Margin From Contribution Margin

Gross margin usually focuses on revenue minus cost of goods sold. Contribution margin goes further and subtracts other expenses that rise with each sale. For traffic planning, contribution margin is usually the more useful number because it measures what each order contributes toward fixed costs and profit.

A practical per-order calculation can look like this:

Contribution margin per order = average order value − product cost − packaging − fulfillment − shipping subsidy − payment fees − return/refund allowance − variable commissions − other per-order costs

Consider a hypothetical $90 average order:

• Product cost: $32
• Packaging and fulfillment: $6
• Shipping support: $8
• Payment fees: $3
• Expected returns/refunds allowance: $4
• Other variable costs: $2

The contribution margin is $35 per order.

The return allowance deserves attention. If refunds and returns are meaningful in your category, ignoring them inflates your apparent margin. The same applies to free shipping. Customers may see “free shipping,” but your business still absorbs some or all of that cost.

If your store sells products with very different economics, avoid using one margin estimate forever. A month centered on high-margin accessories can look different from one centered on bulky, low-margin products.

Use A Weighted Margin When Product Mix Varies

Many ecommerce stores have dozens or hundreds of SKUs with different prices, costs, shipping profiles, and return rates. A simple average can mislead you if sales volume is concentrated in a few products.

A stronger approach is to calculate contribution for each meaningful product group, then weight those margins according to their share of orders or revenue. You do not need a perfect SKU-level financial model to improve your forecast. Even three groups can reveal useful differences:

• High-margin products
• Core products
• Low-margin or promotional products

Suppose your core product leaves $40 contribution, accessories leave $55, and a discounted bundle leaves only $18. If a campaign shifts the order mix toward the bundle, your store may need far more orders and traffic to reach the same profit target.

This is one reason traffic forecasts should be revisited after major promotions, pricing changes, supplier increases, or shipping changes. Conversion can improve while profit deteriorates if shoppers increasingly choose low-contribution offers.

When possible, use recent realized contribution rather than catalog assumptions. Your actual order mix is what funds the business, so your forecasting model should reflect what customers truly buy.

Keep Acquisition Cost In The Right Place

Paid traffic creates an extra modeling choice. If you already subtract customer acquisition cost from contribution margin per new order, do not subtract paid traffic cost again elsewhere. Double counting makes the forecast unnecessarily pessimistic.

For a simple new-customer model, you can calculate:

Contribution after acquisition = contribution margin before acquisition − customer acquisition cost

Then use that post-acquisition contribution in the order formula. This works best when the traffic mix and acquisition cost are reasonably stable.

If you prefer modeling paid traffic at the visitor level, use a different equation:

Net contribution per paid visit = (conversion rate × contribution margin before acquisition) − cost per visit

Then:

Required paid visits = (target profit + fixed costs) ÷ net contribution per paid visit

This version exposes a critical problem quickly. If net contribution per paid visit is zero or negative, scaling that traffic source will not create operating profit under the current assumptions. You need better conversion, stronger order economics, cheaper traffic, or better customer value before increasing spend.

For mixed organic and paid traffic, separate the channels when practical. Their acquisition economics differ too much to treat every visitor as financially identical.

Use A Conversion Rate That Reflects Real Buying Intent

Conversion rate is the variable most likely to make your traffic estimate look precise while being wrong. The safest input comes from your own recent data, segmented enough to reflect where future traffic will come from.

Avoid Using A Generic Ecommerce Benchmark As Your Main Input

Industry benchmarks can provide context, but they are weak foundations for a profit forecast. Conversion varies with product category, price, brand trust, traffic source, device, country, season, customer type, shipping terms, and purchase complexity.

If your store already has meaningful traffic, use your own conversion data. A practical baseline is a recent period that contains enough orders to reduce random noise and resembles the period you are planning. For some stores, 30 days works. Lower-volume stores may need 60 or 90 days.

Suppose your store received 12,000 sessions and 252 orders during a representative period. The session conversion rate is:

252 ÷ 12,000 = 2.1%

You can use 2.1% as the base case, then create a downside case such as 1.7% and an upside case such as 2.5%. This is more defensible than assuming a round 3% because it sounds normal.

If you are launching a new store with little data, use conservative scenarios rather than pretending the conversion rate is known. Update the model once real behavior appears.

Segment Traffic When Source Quality Differs

Ten thousand visits from people actively searching for a product are not equivalent to ten thousand low-intent visits from broad social exposure. The top-line conversion rate hides that difference.

When a large share of future growth will come from a specific channel, calculate the expected conversion rate for that channel separately. Organic product searches, branded search, email, affiliates, creators, paid social, paid search, and referral traffic can behave very differently.

A useful channel model is:

Expected orders from channel = channel traffic × channel conversion rate

Then sum expected orders across channels and compare the result with your required order target.

For example, 5,000 high-intent visits converting at 3% produce 150 orders, while 10,000 broad visits converting at 0.8% produce 80 orders. The larger traffic source generates fewer orders despite twice the volume.

This is why “get more traffic” is often the wrong growth instruction. You want more qualified traffic whose intent matches the offer. Profit planning improves when you evaluate traffic according to economic output rather than raw volume.

Separate New And Returning Customer Behavior

Returning customers often convert differently from new visitors because they already know the brand, product, and checkout experience. Combining both groups can inflate the conversion rate you expect from new traffic acquisition.

If your monthly order target includes repeat purchases, estimate how many orders your existing customer base is likely to generate before calculating how much new acquisition traffic you need.

A simple model is:

New orders required = total required orders − expected repeat orders

Then:

Required new traffic = new orders required ÷ new-visitor conversion rate

Suppose you need 286 total orders and reasonably expect 70 repeat orders from existing customers. You need 216 new-customer orders. At a 1.8% new-visitor conversion rate, that implies 12,000 new visits.

This approach is especially helpful for stores with subscriptions, consumables, replenishment products, or strong repeat purchase behavior. It prevents you from assuming every order must come from fresh traffic.

Keep the estimate conservative. Repeat ordering can change with seasonality, inventory, email activity, customer satisfaction, and product lifecycle.

Set A Profit Target And Work Backward

Once your margin and conversion assumptions are credible, turn the formula into a monthly operating target. This gives marketing, merchandising, and finance one shared set of numbers.

Build A Base, Downside, And Upside Case

Rather than committing to one prediction, create three scenarios. Keep the profit target and fixed costs constant while adjusting the variables that realistically move, especially conversion rate and contribution margin.

Using a $6,000 monthly profit target and $4,000 fixed costs, here is what happens at a 2.5% conversion rate when contribution margin changes:

This table shows why margin improvement can be as powerful as traffic growth. Increasing contribution from $25 to $35 cuts the traffic requirement from 16,000 to roughly 11,440 visits under the same conversion assumption.

Your scenario model should use inputs you can influence. A downside case may include weaker conversion and heavier discounting. A base case can reflect recent normal performance. An upside case can reflect achievable improvements, such as a better product mix or a higher average order value, without assuming unrealistic perfection.

The goal is not to predict the month exactly. It is to know what conditions must exist for your profit target to remain plausible.

Create A Break-Even Floor As A Safety Metric

Your profit target can be ambitious, but you should also know the minimum traffic level required to cover fixed operating costs under your current economics.

Set target profit to zero:

Break-even traffic = fixed costs ÷ (conversion rate × contribution margin per order)

Using fixed costs of $4,000, a 2.5% conversion rate, and $35 contribution per order:

$4,000 ÷ (0.025 × $35) ≈ 4,572 visits

That is the approximate break-even traffic floor under the model assumptions. Traffic below this level does not automatically mean the business loses money because actual conversion or margin may outperform the assumptions. Still, it provides a useful reference point.

I recommend tracking both numbers: break-even traffic and profit-target traffic. The gap between them represents the volume needed to move from covering operating costs to producing your desired profit.

This also helps with seasonal planning. During slower months, your goal may be protecting break-even economics. During stronger months, you may target much higher profit and use excess cash to build inventory, fund future acquisition, or strengthen reserves.

Reduce The Traffic You Need Before Chasing More Visitors

Traffic acquisition can be expensive and slow. Before trying to double visitor volume, check whether stronger conversion or order economics can lower the amount of traffic required.

Improve Conversion Where Purchase Friction Is Highest

Conversion rate affects the traffic requirement directly. If all other variables stay constant, improving conversion reduces the number of visits needed to reach the same order target.

Focus on friction that blocks shoppers who already have purchase intent. Common areas include unclear product information, weak product imagery, confusing variants, unexpected shipping costs, slow mobile pages, limited payment options, poor trust signals, and a complicated checkout path.

Do not treat conversion optimization as changing button colors at random. Start with evidence. Look at product-page exits, cart abandonment, checkout drop-off, device differences, search behavior, and customer questions. Session recordings and heatmaps can help you see where users hesitate, while analytics shows where the largest drop-offs happen.

If your store improves conversion from 2.0% to 2.5%, the 286-order example moves from 14,300 visits to 11,440. That is 2,860 fewer visits needed for the same order target.

The strongest conversion work does not merely create more orders. It makes every unit of traffic more economically productive, which can improve both organic growth efficiency and paid acquisition tolerance.

Increase Contribution Margin Without Hurting Demand

Margin improvement reduces the number of orders required, which then reduces the traffic requirement. You have several levers, and they do not all involve raising prices.

You can improve product mix, negotiate supplier costs, reduce packaging expense, improve shipping rules, lower avoidable returns, bundle complementary products, reduce unnecessary discounting, or encourage customers toward higher-contribution options.

Average order value matters only when the extra revenue creates meaningful extra contribution. A bundle that raises order value $20 but adds $18 of product and fulfillment cost barely improves the economics. Measure contribution, not just checkout size.

Suppose you lift contribution per order from $35 to $45 while keeping the same $10,000 contribution requirement. Required orders fall from about 286 to 223. At a 2.5% conversion rate, estimated traffic falls from 11,440 to 8,920 visits.

This is why I suggest reviewing margin before investing aggressively in traffic. A healthier offer gives every marketing channel more room to work. It can also make promotions less risky because you know the minimum contribution each order needs to preserve the model.

Use Retention To Lower New-Traffic Dependence

A store that earns repeat orders from existing customers does not need every month’s revenue to come from newly acquired visitors. Retention can lower the amount of new traffic needed for a given order target.

The practical move is to forecast repeat orders separately rather than pretending they are free. Email, SMS, loyalty programs, customer support, subscriptions, and remarketing all have costs. Still, repeat demand often uses a different acquisition structure than cold traffic.

If you expect 70 repeat orders in a month and your total target is 286, acquisition only needs to supply the remaining 216 orders. That makes channel planning more realistic.

For consumable products, replenishment timing is especially valuable. If customers usually reorder after a predictable interval, reminders can recover demand that would otherwise require fresh discovery. For durable products, cross-sells or complementary products may matter more than replenishment.

Do not inflate lifetime value to justify weak current economics. Retention is useful when repeat behavior is visible in real customer data. If the initial order loses substantial money and repeat purchasing is uncertain, optimistic lifetime-value assumptions can hide a fragile business.

Know When More Traffic Will Not Fix Profitability

More visitors help only when the store converts them into enough positive contribution. Several warning signs indicate that traffic is not the primary constraint.

Negative Contribution Means Scale Can Increase Losses

If contribution margin per order is negative before fixed costs, every additional sale consumes cash rather than helping cover overhead. In that situation, traffic growth can accelerate losses.

This often happens when a store combines heavy discounts, expensive fulfillment, free shipping, high return rates, marketplace commissions, or paid acquisition without calculating the total cost per order. Revenue can look impressive while the economics deteriorate underneath it.

Before increasing traffic, calculate contribution on the orders you are already receiving. If the number is negative, identify the variable responsible. The fix may involve pricing, product costs, promotion rules, shipping thresholds, channel mix, return reduction, or acquisition cost.

A store with a $10 negative contribution per order does not need more customers under the same model. It needs a different economic structure. Once contribution becomes positive, the traffic formula becomes useful again because each incremental order starts helping cover fixed costs and profit.

This is the most important guardrail in the entire calculation. Never assume volume will rescue a transaction that loses money unless there is a clearly supported repeat-purchase model that changes the economics over time.

Discounting Can Improve Conversion While Damaging The Formula

Discounts often raise conversion because the offer becomes more attractive. That can make surface-level metrics look better: more orders, higher conversion, and perhaps stronger revenue. Yet profit can fall if the discount removes too much contribution from each order.

Suppose contribution drops from $35 to $20 after a promotion, while conversion improves from 2.5% to 3.2%. With $10,000 of required contribution, you now need 500 orders. At 3.2% conversion, that requires about 15,625 visits. Before the promotion, you needed 286 orders and about 11,440 visits.

The promotion improved conversion but increased the traffic requirement because margin fell much more than conversion improved.

Use the combined formula whenever you evaluate a discount:

Required traffic = (target profit + fixed costs) ÷ (conversion rate × contribution margin per order)

This gives you a cleaner answer than looking at conversion rate alone. A promotion is economically useful when the combined effect of conversion, order value, margin, repeat behavior, and acquisition cost strengthens the store’s profit model.

Returns, Refunds, And Failed Deliveries Can Distort Your Inputs

An order is not always the same as a completed profitable sale. Returns, partial refunds, cancellations, failed deliveries, chargebacks, and customer-service concessions can reduce realized contribution after the original conversion event.

If your analytics counts an order immediately but finance later loses part of that revenue, your apparent conversion economics can look better than reality. The problem is especially important in categories with high return rates or costly reverse logistics.

Build an expected allowance into contribution margin using recent realized results. You do not need to predict which specific order will return. You need a reasonable average cost that reflects what normally happens across a large enough set of orders.

For example, if returns and refunds effectively reduce contribution around $4 per order over a representative period, include that $4 in the per-order economics. If a future product category has materially different return behavior, model it separately.

Reconcile your traffic model with actual profit reports each month. If the forecast consistently overstates profit, uncounted post-purchase costs are a likely place to investigate.

Track The Formula With A Simple Profit Dashboard

The model becomes more valuable once you update it with actual data instead of treating it as a one-time calculator. A lightweight dashboard can show which variable is helping or hurting your traffic requirement.

Track The Five Inputs That Matter Most

You do not need an elaborate business-intelligence system to start. Track these five numbers for each planning period:

• Traffic: Use one consistent denominator such as sessions.
• Conversion rate: Orders ÷ the same traffic denominator.
• Contribution margin per order: Realized average after variable costs.
• Fixed operating costs: Expenses that do not rise directly with each order during the period.
• Target operating profit: The profit level you want the store to produce.

A Google Sheet is enough for many smaller stores. Create cells for the five inputs, then calculate required contribution, required orders, break-even traffic, and profit-target traffic. Add downside and upside assumptions beside the base case.

The sheet should also compare forecast with actual performance. If the formula predicts 11,440 visits but you receive 12,500 and still miss profit, inspect conversion and contribution margin before concluding you need even more traffic.

For traffic and ecommerce behavior, Google Analytics 4 can support the measurement layer when it is configured correctly. The key is consistency between the traffic metric and conversion denominator used in your financial model.

Use Profit Analytics When Manual Reconciliation Gets Messy

Manual spreadsheets are useful because they force you to understand the economics. They become less convenient when you sell across many products, markets, channels, and campaigns.

At that stage, ecommerce profit analytics tools can help centralize the variables you would otherwise reconcile manually. Profit Calc and BeProfit are examples from this category. They can be worth exploring when product costs, marketing spend, shipping, fees, and order-level economics are difficult to keep aligned in a spreadsheet.

The tool does not replace the model. You still need to decide what counts as variable cost, what belongs in fixed operating expense, and which profit definition you are targeting. Software can organize data, but poor definitions still produce poor decisions.

Larger stores with multiple acquisition channels may also consider marketing analytics platforms such as Triple Whale when manual channel reconciliation becomes cumbersome. The useful test is simple: does the software reduce reporting friction enough to improve decisions? If your store has modest volume and a few channels, a clean spreadsheet may remain the better option.

Turn The Formula Into A Growth Decision

Once you know your required traffic, the next question is not simply how to get that traffic. It is whether traffic is the most efficient lever available.

Compare Traffic Growth With Conversion And Margin Improvements

Use your model to estimate the effect of each possible improvement before allocating effort. If you need 15,000 visits at current economics, calculate what happens if conversion improves modestly, contribution rises, or repeat orders increase.

For example, you might compare these scenarios:

• Keep conversion and margin unchanged, then acquire 3,000 extra visits.
• Improve conversion enough to produce the same order increase from current traffic.
• Increase contribution per order enough to reduce required order volume.
• Generate more repeat orders so acquisition needs to supply fewer new orders.

This comparison changes the conversation from “we need more traffic” to “which constraint is cheapest and most realistic to improve?”

A store with strong conversion and margins but low awareness probably does need more acquisition. A store with plenty of traffic and weak conversion should fix the shopping experience. A store converting well with thin contribution needs stronger economics. A store with good initial economics but little repeat behavior may gain more from retention work.

The formula helps you choose based on financial leverage rather than marketing habit.

Know What Number To Improve Next

At the end of each reporting period, compare actual performance with the model and identify the largest gap.

If traffic missed plan but conversion and contribution were healthy, acquisition is the obvious constraint. If traffic met plan but orders missed, investigate conversion and traffic quality. If orders met plan but profit missed, inspect contribution margin, returns, discounts, or fixed expenses. If profit exceeded plan with less traffic than expected, identify which variable improved and whether it is repeatable.

This creates a simple diagnostic loop:

1. Compare actual traffic with required traffic.
2. Compare actual conversion with the forecast rate.
3. Compare actual contribution per order with the forecast margin.
4. Compare actual fixed costs with the budget.
5. Update the model and choose the next constraint to improve.

You do not need to optimize every metric at once. The highest-value move is usually the variable creating the largest economic gap. Once that constraint improves, recalculate. Your required traffic number may change more than you expect.

Calculate Your Real Ecommerce Traffic Target

The answer to how much traffic do I need to make ecommerce profit comes from your economics, not a generic visitor benchmark. Start with the profit you want, add fixed costs, calculate how many profitable orders must cover that amount, then use a realistic conversion rate to estimate the traffic required.

The core formula is: Required traffic = (target profit + fixed costs) ÷ (conversion rate × contribution margin per order)

Use your own data wherever possible, keep the traffic denominator consistent, include real variable costs, and test conservative scenarios. Then check whether traffic is truly the limiting factor. Improving conversion, contribution margin, repeat purchasing, or cost control can reduce the visitor volume you need. Recalculate whenever your economics change, and use the model as a practical decision tool rather than a fixed forecast.

Juxhin

I’m Juxhin, the voice behind The Justifiable.
I’ve spent 6+ years building blogs, managing affiliate campaigns, and testing the messy world of online business. Here, I cut the fluff and share the strategies that actually move the needle — so you can build income that’s sustainable, not speculative.

Related posts:

How to Fix Negative Ecommerce Profit Without Chasing More Sales Creating a Website to Sell Products That Converts Fast Why Is My Ecommerce Store Not Making Money? 11 Hidden Profit Killers Why Is My Ecommerce Business Not Making Money? 11 Hidden Profit Killers How to Get Traffic to an Ecommerce Site Without Wasting Money on the Wrong Visitors How to Get Traffic to an Electronic Commerce Website: A 12-Channel Plan